<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stupid Kayakers Deserve to be Rescued</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kayaksandkayaking.com/kayaking-tips/kayaking-safety/stupid-kayakers-deserve-to-be-rescued/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kayaksandkayaking.com/kayaking-tips/kayaking-safety/stupid-kayakers-deserve-to-be-rescued/</link>
	<description>flatwater and ocean kayaking on the west coast of north america</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:46:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fairness in paying for search and rescue &#124; Windy Hilltops</title>
		<link>http://kayaksandkayaking.com/kayaking-tips/kayaking-safety/stupid-kayakers-deserve-to-be-rescued/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Fairness in paying for search and rescue &#124; Windy Hilltops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 09:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kayaksandkayaking.com/?p=1292#comment-71</guid>
		<description>[...] Most of the media (the Herald and Stuff are representative) report the story from a perspective that the kayakers were warned, shouldn&#8217;t have gone, and wasted everyone&#8217;s time. The kayakers themselves (un-named as best as I can tell) claim that they weren&#8217;t in serious trouble, never requested a rescue, and don&#8217;t see why they should have to pay for it. With a quick search I&#8217;ve noticed that several people have blogged thoughts about this story in various places (some with following discussions), notably Michelle over at Love in a Tent, David at Paddling Instructor, and also Kerry L at Kayak &amp; Kayaking. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Most of the media (the Herald and Stuff are representative) report the story from a perspective that the kayakers were warned, shouldn&#8217;t have gone, and wasted everyone&#8217;s time. The kayakers themselves (un-named as best as I can tell) claim that they weren&#8217;t in serious trouble, never requested a rescue, and don&#8217;t see why they should have to pay for it. With a quick search I&#8217;ve noticed that several people have blogged thoughts about this story in various places (some with following discussions), notably Michelle over at Love in a Tent, David at Paddling Instructor, and also Kerry L at Kayak &amp; Kayaking. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

